Archive for November, 2003

Geography and the Tribe

Wednesday, November 12th, 2003

vbtbutton.gifI’ve been thinking about the importance of geography in maintaining the urban tribe. As anyone who has read the book knows, I openly struggled with the definition of these groups. (This was Many people contacted me to tell me about their online community or their high school friends who keep track of each other by phone but only see each other once a year. As much as I wanted the definition to be inclusive, these groups were not the thing I was trying to describe.

It is only through geography and time that these groups maintain the momentum to remain the central support structure in someone’s life. (more…)

Urban Tribes: My Tribe(s)

Wednesday, November 12th, 2003

vbtbutton.gif [If you haven’t already, read the two entries below first]

So, that said, what exactly did I get out of Urban Tribes?

See, here’s the thing – by Watters’ definition, I’m sort of tribeless right now. I can honestly say that I’ve been a part of two tribes in my life, neither of which have a day-to-day influence in my life like the massively inbred, interconnected tribes that are described in the book. (more…)

Urban Tribes: Review

Wednesday, November 12th, 2003

vbtbutton.gif So, here’s the first thing you need to know about Ethan Watters’ Urban Tribes – it’s not really about urban tribes.

That’s not to say that he doesn’t spend a sizeable amount of time trying to flesh out the definition of an urban tribe, because he does, and it’s also not to say that the urban tribe as a category isn’t an important part of the book, because it is. In the end, though, Urban Tribes is about two very specific things – marriage, and Ethan Watters.

Now, I don’t want this to come across the wrong way – I don’t think that either marriage or Ethan Watters are bad subjects. In fact, I find both rather interesting, for varying reasons. It’s just that there’s a bit of a bait and switch going on with the title: one might expect more of a sociological study a la Bowling Alone, while the book itself is more of a hybrid expanded-magazine-feature-story/memoir.

Once I realized this and shifted my expectations accordingly, I found Urban Tribes to be a pretty good, thought-provoking read. I definitely didn’t have the same sort of response to Watters and the other “tribe members” he describes as Meg did – I found the descriptions resonant in varying degrees, and kept expecting to turn the page and find a quote from someone I knew talking about one of the tribes I’ve been a part of. The writing resonated with me, from the hyperconscious self-awareness to the tension between being ironic and po-mo while at the same time grappling with real things that can’t be reduced to a wink and a shrug.

So, what is an Urban Tribe? According to Watters, thanks to a combination of influences (among them increasing migration to cities post-college and the idea that we should be marrying our soulmates, and not settling for less), the kids today are waiting longer and longer to get married. While they’re hanging around in a sort of pre-adulthood limbo, many of these people seem to find the support that one draws from family in their friends, forming densely-interconnected groups that Watters dubs “urban tribes.”

In my gut, the idea makes sense and seems to fit with my experiences, but not completely. As someone who’s spent the past 5 1/2 years in a PhD program, I tend to latch on to theories and arguments in everything I read, so naturally my response to Urban Tribes was to push on this theory and see how it stands up.

On the one hand, there’s clearly a sense that the idea of the urban tribe saturates popular culture – there are countless television shows that revolve around tribes, with popular shows like Seinfeld and Friends at the top of the list, not to mention Sex and the City. But here’s the rub – is there something that makes the Friends crew an urban tribe but not the gang from Cheers (who don’t seem to fit the Gen-X, unmarried-and-treading-water-while-enjoying-life demographic that Watters describes)?

The logical conclusion of this sort of thinking is the sort of review that Peter Merholz wrote (and which Meg cited on Monday), which finds the “urban tribe” lacking as a sociological theory. It’s true that Watters’s research is essentially hundreds of self-selected responses by email, and that the exploration of the urban tribe in America is at times less than rigorous.

But hell, Watters himself knows that. The entire first chapter of the book is about how the idea of the “Urban Tribe” grew out of a two-page magazine article and a Good Morning America appearance. When you think about it, Watters’ doing everything possible to keep us from reading this book as a sociological treatise (though he grapples with and critiques Bowling Alone later in Urban Tribes). As he writes when talking about the floods of emails he received after the GMA appearance, “In the end, I had given them little more than the preciously coined phrase ‘urban tribes.’” (p. 61).

That’s the key, really. “Urban Tribe” is just a label that Watters uses to understand his own life, and which seems to resonate with others as they try to understand theirs. In the end, this isn’t a book that’s going to give firm guidance to those between 18 and 40 who’re trying to navigate life between school and marriage/family. This is a memoir by one person trying to do the same thing, wrestling between confidence and self-doubt and generally muddling through alright. For those of us in this boat, reading Urban Tribes leaves us without any rigorous tools to analyze our lives, but it gives us material to think with, to figure out whether our lives are anything like Watters’, and what (if anything) we can learn from his attempts to figure things out for himself.

A Note on the Virtual Book Tour…

Wednesday, November 12th, 2003

vbtbutton.gifToday, the 3rd-ever Virtual Book Tour sets up shop here, thanks to the efforts of maestro Kevin Smokler. The book on the agenda is Ethan Watters’ Urban Tribes, and if you don’t have a copy and want one you can order it here. Welcome to anybody who’s new on the tour – if you haven’t already, you might check out the posts from Monday and Tuesday.

So, here’s the weird thing about taking part in a Virtual Book Tour – it seems that the general norms of blogging entail commenting on something and linking to it so that the reader can read your comments, read the original, then come back to your comments in an essentially frictionless process. In this case, however, I’m writing about something which by definition you haven’t read, and which you’ll have to buy and read over a period of days if not weeks in order to see for yourself what you think (if, after reading my thoughts, you want to at all). On the other hand, I don’t want to just write a generic review, ‘cause that’s not embracing the medium of the blog.

So, here’s what we’ll do: first, I’ll post my take on the book without too much exposition of its contents, then in another post I’ll talk about how the book resonated with my own experiences. I’ve set up an account for Ethan Watters, so he might show up at some point with a response and his own thoughts. Comments are, of course, heartily encouraged…

…and, we’re off!

Matrix ARG…

Tuesday, November 11th, 2003

There seems to have been an ARG (alternate reality game) unfolding across the Internet for about 6 weeks now, centered around the release of Matrix:Revolutions. As best as I can tell from a cursory look around, the game seems to revolve around a company that creates immersive gaming software and their latest product, which may be the program that evolved into the Matrix of the three movies.

These kinds of games are just fascinating to me, with Majestic the granddaddy of them all. An odd thing about this one, though, is that unlike the game that built up to the release of Kubrick’s A.I., this has been happening completely under the radar…no media attention that I’ve seen, and no mention on any of the big movie fan sites (AICN was all over the A.I. one). Some seem to believe that this isn’t a marketing ploy at all, but a fan-produced ARG not unlike a piece of fan fiction, which would be even more astonishing, considering the depth of the material involved…

Daily Show Tix, right here!

Monday, November 10th, 2003

Hey, everyone – so Jenny and I wound up with two extra tickets for today’s taping of The Daily Show. We’ll be getting in line around 4:30-ish, and the studio is on 54th St. between 10th and 11th Aves, so you’d need to meet us there (they hand out numbers around then, so we couldn’t just save more places until the doors open at 5:30)…

If you’re interested, send me an email or instant message (STSJosh via aol) before 3 pm – that’s when we’ll be heading out. Or, you can try my cell phone…the number’s on my cv, linked on the right.

Oh, and the guest seems to be Will Farrell, though I’m not sure if it’s a live or taped interview (we got suckered on that count last week)…

Matrix Revolutions

Sunday, November 9th, 2003

Saw The Matrix:Revolutions last Wednesday with Dave, Nina and Randy (check out Dave’s thoughts here, though you might need to scroll a bit). The theater was packed – there was a line to get up the escalator, so you could give your ticket to an usher and wait in another line, to get up to the theater and finally find seats. Thankfully, we’d bought tickets on Fandango beforehand, because there was no line at all for tickets – they’d sold out well before we got to the theater.

My short take on the movie: liked it quite a bit. I had also really liked the second one (even more than I’d liked the first), so you should probably take my thoughts on the film with a grain of salt.

[spoilers below – if you keep reading, consider yourself warned] (more…)

Joe Trippi…

Friday, November 7th, 2003

Great article on Joe Trippi (Howard Dean’s campaign manager) in The New Republic online. I won’t excerpt any here, but go read the article. It’s a great profile of a case where vision and ideas drove technology use, rather than the other way around…

Reefer madness

Tuesday, November 4th, 2003

So, it’s a weird thing to be chugging along, writing a chunk of one’s dissertation. It’s not that you really stop doing research, it’s just that the additional research takes the form of spackle that you need to slather in the gaps where you realize that you don’t have something that you need.

In my case today, the spackle I needed was something on how porn first started showing up videotapes – there’s a lot of conventional wisdom on the subject, and a lot of speculation, but hard historical facts are difficult to come by. So, I’m following up on a citation in Fred Wasser’s book Veni, Vidi, Video, which points to a Wall Street Journal article from May of 1985 about someone who bragged that he was the first person to market pornography on a videocassette. The guy’s name was Reuben Sturman, which rang a bell. Pulling up Amazon, I check a hunch and confirm that he’s one of the subjects of Eric Schlosser’s latest book, Reefer Madness. With that in mind, I’ll be heading off to the Strand tomorrow to pick up a copy, since the odds of my being able to get a book this new and popular from either the Cornell library or (via Jenny) the NYU library are slim to none. I’ll buy the book, read it, and digest it.

All for what’ll probably amount to a paragraph (if I’m lucky) in a several-hundred page dissertation. It’s kind of exhausting if you think about it.

“Electron Band Structure In Germanium, My Ass”

Sunday, November 2nd, 2003

Just came across this lab report, which if nothing else is evidence that writing is an essential skill in the sciences. The author’s home page is also worth a look – my favorite part is his riff on sociology:

“Those arrogant engineers and physical scientists, who do they think they are to deny that sociology is a rigorous field? Sure, the extreme impracticality of controlled, repeatable experimentation makes it difficult to actually test ideas, but that doesn’t mean that the ideas are any less valid. If you don’t believe me, I’m willing to create obtuse jargon to make the intellectual soundness more apparent. In fact, I’m even willing to check math books out of the library and copy words and symbols from them.”

Heh.