SXSW Notes: Book Digitization and the Revenge of the Librarians
Saturday, March 11th, 2006Panelists:
- Daniel Clancy Google
- Bob Stein
- Danielle Tiedt GM, Microsoft
- Elizabeth Lawley Professor, RIT
LL: Concerns ->
- chilling effect of requiring login for viewing of resources, etc.
- rankings are opaque systems
DC:
- Asked group of students how many had been to the library in last year; less than 1/2 had.
- two programs – publisher program and library program
- publisher program works with currently available materials
- library program works with out-of-copyright materials, etc.
DT:
- Sees Microsoft’s digitization efforts as intended to help them “answer questions better”
- Wishes government would take a larger role in digitization – from Microsoft’s perspective, she’d rather everything was already scanned so that all she had to do was crawl it, index it and create a user interface that makes users want to use it via Microsoft.
- Ultimately, corporations are going to be concerned about the bottom line
DC:
- Asks Bob Stein:
- Would you rather we cancel the project?
- Would you really want the U.S. government in charge?
LL: What about decentralization? Can individuals scan individual books?
Kevin Smokler (question): Is there really such a demand for digitization of 19th century lit that justifies a rush forward without concern for the cultural and ethical questions posed?
DC: Yes (particularly for still-in-copyright works)
BS: There’s a certian disingenuousness to the argument that this is all about making the materials available; the purpose of Google’s project is not so much about making the world’s information available as it is about serving ads and gathering information about us.