Comments on: On leaving an academic blog fallow http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/ Mapping knowledge online since 1999 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:35:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: currency online trading http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/comment-page-1/#comment-60983 currency online trading Thu, 10 May 2007 20:35:55 +0000 http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/#comment-60983 currency online trading ... http://user.aol.com/onlnusafinance/currency currency online trading ... currency online trading
…

http://user.aol.com/onlnusafinance/currency currency online trading
…

]]> By: Digital History Hacks » Blog Archive » Digital History Year in Review http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/comment-page-1/#comment-38144 Digital History Hacks » Blog Archive » Digital History Year in Review Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:41:13 +0000 http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/#comment-38144 [...] Josh Greenberg decided to leave his blog Epistemographer Fallow, with good results. Meanwhile, Tom Schienfeldt highlighted the “unintentional, unconventional and amateur” in Found History. Emma Tonkin argued that Folksonomies are just plain-text tagging under a new name. [...] [...] Josh Greenberg decided to leave his blog Epistemographer Fallow, with good results. Meanwhile, Tom Schienfeldt highlighted the “unintentional, unconventional and amateur” in Found History. Emma Tonkin argued that Folksonomies are just plain-text tagging under a new name. [...]

]]> By: Digital History Hacks » Blog Archive » Behind the Scenes of a Digital History Site http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/comment-page-1/#comment-25330 Digital History Hacks » Blog Archive » Behind the Scenes of a Digital History Site Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:21:28 +0000 http://www.epistemographer.com/2006/09/01/on-leaving-an-academic-blog-fallow/#comment-25330 [...] In a thoughtful post about doing digital history, Josh Greenberg wrote On an abstract level, I think that there’s a tension between making tools and using tools that comes from a deeper question of audience. When you’re using a tool (or hacking a tool that someone else has already built), there’s a singleminded focus on your own purpose – there’s an end that you want to achieve, and you reach for whatever’s at hand that will (sometimes with a little adjustment) help you get there. When trying to build a tool, on the other hand, there’s a fundamental shift in orientation – rather than only thinking about your own intentions, you have to think about your users and anticipate their needs and desires. [...] [...] In a thoughtful post about doing digital history, Josh Greenberg wrote On an abstract level, I think that there’s a tension between making tools and using tools that comes from a deeper question of audience. When you’re using a tool (or hacking a tool that someone else has already built), there’s a singleminded focus on your own purpose – there’s an end that you want to achieve, and you reach for whatever’s at hand that will (sometimes with a little adjustment) help you get there. When trying to build a tool, on the other hand, there’s a fundamental shift in orientation – rather than only thinking about your own intentions, you have to think about your users and anticipate their needs and desires. [...]

]]>