<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Epistemographer &#187; Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epistemographer.com/category/work/research/open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epistemographer.com</link>
	<description>Mapping knowledge online since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source Ethics&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.epistemographer.com/2005/04/01/open-source-ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epistemographer.com/2005/04/01/open-source-ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Greenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epistemographer.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating case that lays bare some of the fundamental assumptions (and internal contradictions) of an open source community: * &#8220;Matt Mullenweg&#8221;:http://photomatt.net creates &#8220;WordPress&#8221;:http://wordpress.org * WordPress gets &#8220;popular&#8221;:http://www.daveschalkboard.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/13/how-popular-is-wordpress/ and grows an &#8220;open source&#8221;:http://wordpress.org/about/ &#8220;community&#8221;:http://wordpress.org/development/ * Matt makes a decision to spend some of WordPress&#8217; &#8220;whuffie&#8221;:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie, &#8220;gets&#8221;:http://www.waxy.org/archive/2005/03/30/wordpres.shtml &#8220;caught&#8221;:http://www.waxy.org/archive/2005/04/01/wordpres.shtml, &#8220;responds&#8221;:http://photomatt.net/2005/04/01/a-response/ Takehome questions &#8211; how much agency does the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating case that lays bare some of the fundamental assumptions (and internal contradictions) of an open source community:</p>
<p>* &#8220;Matt Mullenweg&#8221;:http://photomatt.net creates &#8220;WordPress&#8221;:http://wordpress.org<br />
* WordPress gets &#8220;popular&#8221;:http://www.daveschalkboard.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/13/how-popular-is-wordpress/ and grows an &#8220;open source&#8221;:http://wordpress.org/about/ &#8220;community&#8221;:http://wordpress.org/development/<br />
* Matt makes a decision to spend some of WordPress&#8217; &#8220;whuffie&#8221;:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie, &#8220;gets&#8221;:http://www.waxy.org/archive/2005/03/30/wordpres.shtml &#8220;caught&#8221;:http://www.waxy.org/archive/2005/04/01/wordpres.shtml, &#8220;responds&#8221;:http://photomatt.net/2005/04/01/a-response/</p>
<p>Takehome questions &#8211; how much agency does the founder of an open source project have once the project has grown beyond his/her personal efforts? And what are legitimate revenue streams when people support a project they use not because they have to (buying), but because they want to (tipping/patronage)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epistemographer.com/2005/04/01/open-source-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

